I love your description of God, "not as a being but as the ground of all being and existence–that by which all things are–and who enlivens all matter, from subatomic particles to unfathomable expanses of the cosmos."
If I’m not wrong, I think that’s Einstein’s god too- and definitely not the God of the fundamentalists. Not a personal God who can known you and be known. Seems reasonable to me.
Beautifully stated. This idea resonates with me so that it feels like a simple thought - God simply is. But when I try to express this thought to others they often find it too complex or deep or over-simplified. I'm glad we have you to explain it in words that more of our generation can understand. Thank you.
I love your description of God, "not as a being but as the ground of all being and existence–that by which all things are–and who enlivens all matter, from subatomic particles to unfathomable expanses of the cosmos."
If I’m not wrong, I think that’s Einstein’s god too- and definitely not the God of the fundamentalists. Not a personal God who can known you and be known. Seems reasonable to me.
Beautifully stated. This idea resonates with me so that it feels like a simple thought - God simply is. But when I try to express this thought to others they often find it too complex or deep or over-simplified. I'm glad we have you to explain it in words that more of our generation can understand. Thank you.
“The ground of all being” finally makes sense to me. It is the phrase “enlivens all matter” that does it. Love it when the pieces begin to fit. Thx.